HARTFORD, Conn. (CN) — Nearly 10 years after he was pardoned for sexually assaulting a 25-year-old woman, a Connecticut man claims in a federal complaint that he is barred from using the library and other public spaces because of an unconstitutional town law. Full Article
Related posts
-
OH: The latest fad: prohibiting registrants from living within 2,000 feet of their victims’ homes
Source: ohiohouse.gov 11/19/25 … Under current law, sex offenders are prohibited from living near schools and... -
FL: Registrant arrested for crossing a school parking lot (entrapment by geography)
Source: tapinto.net and FAC 11/10/25 MELBOURNE, FL – Melbourne police arrested a 46-year-old Cocoa man Nov. 6 after officers... -
Florida action alert: Take action now to oppose HB 45 / SB 212
Source: Florida Action Committee The Florida bill banning registrants from living within 1000 feet from public...

He is being Punished.
Maybe they will grant him relief and he’ll go away without anymore fuss. But I’d be very surprised if they squashed the law. Good for those bringing the case!! Wish I had the guts my wife & children are mentally BROKEN & fragile.
The false stat that the 2003 SCOTUS based every thing upon is still being purported as truth in lower courts.
from the article:
======
“The single purported justification for the ordinance is that ‘recidivism rates for released sex offenders is alarmingly high, especially for those who commit their crimes against children,’” the complaint states.
Calling this statement “false,” Doe and his group note that the recidivism rate for sex offenders as a class is actually “lower than that for every category of offenders other than murderers.”
======
Can we sue the SCOTUS for using false data that was never substantiated? We have research work from PhD’s that reveal the “frightening and high” recidivism rate is false. We have NJ’s 21 year study that proved the registry did not affect the rate of sex crimes 10 year before or 10 years after the implementation of the registry.